Similar Posts
How Immigration Enforcement Shapes Latinx Candidates Preferences
Some research suggests the threat posed by immigration enforcement compels Latinxs to support Democratic politicians.
Denigrating Democracy: How Partisan Competition Sparks Xenophobia in Lebanon
Protection of minorities is a hallmark of liberal democracy, but partisan competition typically requires appealing to majoritarian groups. When do electoral incentives encourage candidates to target immigrant communities with racist or discriminatory rhetoric? This paper aims to address this question through a novel dataset of refugee-related Twitter posts by political elites in Lebanon, the country…
Living in the Shadow of Deportation: How Deportation Threat Forestalls Political Assimilation Among Immigrants and Their Co-Ethnics
Prior research demonstrates acculturated co-ethnics of immigrant groups adopt restrictive immigration policy preferences akin to that of host country dominant groups. However, a puzzle remains where acculturated Latinxs in the United States still maintain relatively liberal immigration policy preferences despite their distance from the canonical immigrant archetype (e.g. Spanish-speaking, immigrant). To answer the puzzle, I…
Social Identity Complexity and Affective Polarization in the American Electorate
Rising levels of affective polarization have drawn increased attention and concern amongst public opinion and political behavior scholars.
Ethnic Favoritism in Street-level Bureaucracy?
Is there ethnic favoritism in street-level bureaucracy? And do conflict legacies facilitate ethnic favoritism? Street-level bureaucracy is the primary state institution that allows for direct interactions between ordinary citizens and agents of the state. While evidence of ethnic favoritism in distributive politics is overwhelming, existing works primarily explain the state agents’ behavior in contexts where they…
Appeals to proportional distributive fairness mitigate ethnocentric bias in policy evaluation
The literature on welfare chauvinism shows that ethnocentric bias reduces individual support for outgroup redistributive policies. To limit bias, scholarship suggests framing policies universally or focusing on beneficiary deservingness. However, policies intended to support disadvantaged groups and ensure equity cannot always be framed in universal terms. Moreover, individuals hold minoritized groups to a deservingness double…